The authoritative source for independent research on UK-EU relations

13 May 2021

Before last week’s local elections, we profiled five ‘councils to watch’, explaining how each might be able to help us answer a specific question about patterns of voter behaviour in England.

Now that the results are in, it is time to go through the five councils, to see what happened in the councils we identified, and to try and answer the questions we posed.

Here, we analyse Hertfordshire – an area of ‘affluent Remainia’ which elected Conservatives in 10 out of is 11 constituencies at the last election, despite some heavy swings away from the party. Was the challenge faced by the Conservative Party in these areas in December 2019 a high tide for ‘pro-Remain’ parties, or the makings of a long-term problem for Boris Johnson?

Why did we choose Hertfordshire?

Hertfordshire is a classic part of ‘affluent Remainia’: pro-Remain, relatively affluent areas which Boris Johnson largely successfully defended from the Liberal Democrats in December 2019 (with the exception of St Albans). This was achieved while making gains in different parts of the country where the Conservatives have traditionally done less well. Yet these types of areas are where Boris Johnson’s Conservatives are now most vulnerable – particularly to the Liberal Democrats, but also Labour if it can coral the social liberal vote.

If the swings away from the Conservative Party in some parts of Hertfordshire were to be replicated across the county – and Labour were able to make advances as well as the Liberal Democrats – there was a small chance that the Conservative Party would lose overall control of the council.

What happened?

The Conservatives retained control of Hertfordshire County Council, but lost five seats, leaving them with 46 out of 78 seats. The Lib Dems made moderate gains, up four seats to 23, to entrench their position as Hertfordshire’s second party. The Greens gained a seat on the Council, while Labour fell back one to 7 seats.

Looking deeper at the results and the seats that did change hands, it is clear that the Liberal Democrats are advancing in areas of Hertfordshire where they are strongest. In places such as Hitchin and Harpenden, strong showings in the 2019 general election have been built on in these local contests, indicating the way in which the party’s voter base has changed in the post-Brexit period. A 13.5% swing in Harpenden North East saw defeat for the Conservatives’ leader on the council by 41 votes, from a 1,000 deficit in 2017.

Elsewhere, every ward in St Albans is now solidly Liberal Democrat.

The Liberal Democrats and Labour were within a 10 per cent swing of the Conservatives in 16 of the county’s 78 wards: nine where Labour was the nearest challenger, and seven where the Liberal Democrats were in second place. The Liberal Democrats won five of these seven contests, while Labour won three out of nine of these targets.

Indeed, in areas where the Labour Party are the key challengers to the Conservatives and held seats – wards around Welwyn Garden City and Stevenage, for example – the Labour Party actually went backwards and the Conservative Party gained wards, both in district councils and county council contests. These counteracted any Labour gains elsewhere.

Was this story replicated elsewhere?

While Hertfordshire did not change hands, these warning signs for the Conservative Party turned into the reality of losing control: in Oxfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Tunbridge Wells, the Conservative Party lost their overall council majorities despite the generally buoyant national picture, due mainly to Liberal Democrat gains.

The story of last Thursday was Labour stasis rather than advance in marginal places where the demographics – a higher number of under 40s, graduates and social liberal voters – are broadly on their side. However, there were some key exceptions in places like Falmouth in the South West and Shoreham and Worthing – where Labour gains demonstrated that the Conservatives are losing relative ground.

The success on Saturday evening in the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough mayoral election, with Labour winning 75% of Liberal Democrat transfers, both demonstrated the problem and the opportunity for Labour and the Liberal Democrats: in many places they are able to absorb second preferences from each other. This will not be helpful in future mayoral contests conducted under first past the post or, perhaps more pertinently, in Westminster elections.

What are the implications?

The results demonstrated that the demographic problem we identified for the Conservative Party is real.

It is likely we will continue to hear more about the ‘blue wall’ – the structural, defensive problem faced by a Conservative Party that deemphasises economic investment in the south, and advocates authoritarianism while being in power in relatively liberal places.

However, the rising tide of government popularity sunk most progressive boats in this election, and the long-term shifts in demographics in places like Hertfordshire are important but glacial.

Whether a ten-point lead – and a divided opposition – is something the Conservative can continue to rely on will determine whether these results have significant implications for the future of politics in England. If the government’s lead falls, and opposition parties can find a route to, then a significant chunk of Hertfordshire’s 10 Conservative MPs could start to feel the pressure.

By Sarah Overton, Joël Reland, Paula Surridge and Alan Wager, UK in a Changing Europe


Recent Articles